You the Shia believe that Muawiyah, who was appointed as ruler of Sham by Umar, had put together a ‘factory’ of hadith forgery, and that the Sunnis rely on these forged hadiths instead of relying on the evidences existing in the Quran and history.This shows that not only are you totally unaware of history, but also are extremely deficient in Usul Fiqh, Dirayah and hadith. You should know that most of the hadiths of the Sunnis were gathered and compiled after the Umayyid dynasty. The Umayyid dynasty ended and it was only after that, that Bukhari (256 ah), Imam Malek (150 ah) and others appeared and this is the reason why most hadith sources were compiled and written during the Abbasid dynasty’s rule, who had taken power with the slogan of supporting the ‘Ahlul-Bayt’.

According to reports in history that can't be denied, the transcription of hadiths was banned by Umar, and since there was no written proof around and also, because there were more than enough motives for the heads of the Umayyids to forge hadiths on false virtues, not to mention all the necessary resources and wealth that was at their disposal and they used for this task, the forging of hadiths became quite common then, and subsequently, the sources that were later compiled (after the writing of hadiths was made legal once again) were based on these same forged hadiths. As for the Abbasid rulers, although they began with the slogan of supporting the Ahlul-Bayt and took power with it, but as time passed, they followed the footsteps of the Umayyids, because it was only by this that they could maintain their rule, or else they would have to hand it over to the Ahlul-Bayt and their followers. Some scholars even believe that the aggression and transgression of the Abbasids was more than the Umayyids. .

اسلام کوئست

Reference:

Created in 1400/12/21

Short link